Differences in configuration between salt spray test chambers and fiberglass

Many people, when shopping, prefer to buy old brands or models that they or their company have used before. New products are often advertised for their appearance and performance, but people are more confident in old models they've used themselves. In reality, the quality of a product can be determined by its configuration. Let's examine the differences in configuration between a new type of salt spray test chamber and a salt spray test. Below, let's understand the configuration differences between a salt spray test chamber and fiberglass!

Category: Industry News

  Many people, when shopping, prefer to buy old brands or models that they or their company have used before. New products are often advertised for their appearance and performance, but people stick with older models they've used and trust. In reality, the quality of a product can be determined by its configuration. Let's examine the differences in configuration between a new salt spray test chamber and an older model. Below, we'll explore the differences in configuration between a salt spray test chamber and a fiberglass chamber!

  1. New salt spray test chambers use high-strength, corrosion-resistant PVC boards, resulting in a beautiful, lightweight design. Fiberglass is fragile and heavy. With industry development and market demand, PVC board is replacing fiberglass as the material of choice for salt spray chambers.

  2. New salt spray test chambers use bottom tank heating and a titanium alloy material far-infrared heating method. This method allows for rapid temperature increase and even temperature distribution throughout the chamber, making it easy to control. Fiberglass chambers use a primitive bottom heating element and baffle plate dry heating method, which can cause premature aging and reduce the lifespan of the chamber.

  3. New PVC salt spray test chambers include a saltwater preheating device to ensure the saltwater temperature matches the chamber temperature, minimizing temperature fluctuations during testing to within 0.1. Additionally, the saltwater tank is built-in, saving space and improving structural efficiency. Fiberglass chambers require a separate saltwater tank, often placed on the back of the chamber. The saltwater temperature fluctuates with the ambient temperature, resulting in larger temperature variations within the chamber during testing.

  4. New plastic salt spray test chambers have dual-level water shortage protection and over-temperature protection. They automatically shut down and alarm in case of water shortage or temperature abnormalities. Fiberglass salt spray chambers currently only have over-temperature protection.

  5. New plastic salt spray test chambers include a saltwater filtration system, unlike fiberglass chambers. This prevents nozzle clogging and ensures continuous spraying throughout the test.

  6. New plastic salt spray test chambers feature a more scientifically designed saturator, using a state-of-the-art domestic titanium metal heater, degassing filter, and low-water level alarm protection, allowing for continuous spraying for 72 hours without refilling.

  7. New plastic salt spray test chambers have a more user-friendly sealing groove design, allowing for easy drying after testing. Fiberglass chambers lack this design, requiring the use of absorbent materials to remove water.

  The above describes the configuration differences between a salt spray test chamber and a fiberglass chamber. For more information, please contact us!